From: Better Cupertino
Date: Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:15 PM
Subject: Development Impact Fee for Library, Comm. Centers, Public Safety, etc.
To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org>, David Brandt <davidb@cupertino.org>, planning@cupertino.org
Dear Mayor Sinks, Vice Mayor Chang, Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners,
Cupertino should have a sustainable financing plan to provide basic services for the growing number of residents. This can be achieved by charging Development Impact Fee, as many other cities have done.
These fees help mitigate the aggregated impact of new development projects on basic city services, like parks, library, community centers, public safety needs, city staff and facility needs, sewage and water systems. Every new development should contribute to the Development Impact Fee.
Cupertino should have a sustainable financing plan to provide basic services for the growing number of residents. This can be achieved by charging Development Impact Fee, as many other cities have done.
These fees help mitigate the aggregated impact of new development projects on basic city services, like parks, library, community centers, public safety needs, city staff and facility needs, sewage and water systems. Every new development should contribute to the Development Impact Fee.
In addition to the Development Impact Fee, Palo Alto also charges a
Transportation Impact Fee as Citywide Transportation Impact Fee $3,439
per net new PM peak hour trip. (Also specified in the document above)
Cupertino should have a sustainable
financing plan to provide basic services for the residents. Every new
development, whether or not it requires GPA, should contribute to the
Development Impact fee.
Eventually, such impact fee
can help fund additional library branches, community centers, police and
fire stations or a new city hall. Other cities have also assessed
impact fees for emergency services, sewage and water systems, etc.
Cupertino
should not reply on community benefits (or voluntary community
amenities) derived from granting exception for the General Plan to pay
for basic city services. If we do, there is some flaw with the city's
financing structure and it should be fixed.
Note that
these fees, if adopted, give the Council negotiation power. When
necessary, the Council can always give developers a discount as an
incentive to promote a certain type of development in certain areas, as
San Jose has done. And when economy is slow, the Council can also
suspend the collection of the fee for a short time at your discretion.
Please consider adopt the
Development Impact Fee to truly mitigate the
impact of new development projects on basic city services. With so many
projects already built and so many new projects being proposed, Cupertino desperately need to adopt Development Impact Fee to provide basic city services.
Sincerely,
Liang Chao
No comments:
Post a Comment