---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Liang C
Date: Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Apple Cautions
To: City Council <citycouncil@cupertino.org>, City Clerk CityClerk@cupertino.org
Apple
Cautions “The City Should Set Forth in the GPA the Key Issues that Need
to Be Taken into Account…., Since Deferring this Step May Unduly Bind
the City in the Future.”
Attached is my powerpoint slide for last night's meeting.
And you have the authority to require that
the neighborhood be notified much earlier in the project development
phase instead of the last minute.
And you have the
authority to require the Main Street developers to notify neighborhoods
who attended the 2009 meetings when Sand Hill come back to modify the
project in 2012. But you choose to leave this up to the developer's good
will.
On May 19th, if you approve the items of GPA
without notifying the surrounding neighborhoods who will be affected by
those changes, you are starting the same cycle. A few years later,
another neighborhood will be at the council meeting and request the
height, the density be reduced and the setback be increase, what will
you say to that neighborhood? My hands are tied since the project meets
all zoning code?
A few years later, you may not be on
the council any more. But you would be the council who put in the ropes
that tie their hands. Please keep that in mind when you vote on May
19th.
Please remember that developers will build to the
max under the zoning code and regulation you put in place. Don't rezone.
Don't relax the regulation. Only rezone on a project by project basis
after neighborhood community meetings. And you have 4 times a year to do
it.
Liang
Attachment: Apple Cautionary Letter (Page 17-18, CC_LateCommentsMemo).pdf
Attachment: Apple Cautions 2015-05-05, by Liang.pdf
Attachment: Apple Cautions 2015-05-05, by Liang.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment